Deep Dive: The Data Review in a System Assurance Review


If a Process Review defines how work flows, a Functional Review defines how the system supports it, and a Technical Review defines how the platform performs, then the Data Review focuses on something equally fundamental:
Is the data underpinning your system accurate, structured, and enabling effective decision-making?
A Data Review assesses how information is structured, maintained, and used within Maximo or MAS, identifying opportunities to improve usability, performance, and alignment to best practice.
Data is often one of the most overlooked elements of an enterprise system — yet it is a primary driver of both system performance and business effectiveness.
Common challenges include:
Over time, these issues can lead to:
A Data Review provides a structured approach to identify and address these issues at their root.
A Data Review evaluates how data is organised and used across a Maximo or MAS solution, identifying both structural and operational improvement opportunities. This typically focuses on five key areas:
A well-designed data structure is essential for both usability and scalability.
Excessive custom data design often creates maintenance overhead and upgrade risk.
This helps identify whether data is contributing to performance issues.
Unmanaged data growth is a common cause of both performance issues and reporting challenges.
This ensures that data quality is maintained over time — not just at a single point.
A Data Review may be conducted by Solution Architects, Consultants, or Developers, depending on the scope and client requirements.
The approach typically includes:
The objective is not simply to analyse data but to connect data design to real-world system performance and usability.
A Data Review often uncovers issues that have built up over time, such as:
It also frequently highlights a critical point: Even the best-configured system cannot perform effectively with poor-quality data.
The Data Review is designed to deliver practical, actionable improvements that can often provide immediate value.
Key outputs include:
These outputs are typically prioritised to enable both immediate improvements and longer-term data strategy.
The Data Review plays a key role in delivering the SAR outcomes:
Without high-quality data, improvements in process, functionality, or technology cannot be fully realised.
Within the SAR lifecycle — Discover → Assess → Gaps & Risks → Recommend → Roadmap — the Data Review ensures that:
It provides the data integrity baseline required for both operational efficiency and strategic decision-making.
If the other elements of a System Assurance Review ensure that processes, functionality, and technology are aligned, the Data Review ensures that the information driving those processes is accurate, usable, and fit for purpose.
By addressing data structure, quality, and lifecycle management, the Data Review enables organisations to:
Ultimately, it transforms data from a potential liability into a strategic asset.
Discover everything you need to know to modernize your asset management strategy.
Inside, you’ll learn:

ActiveG, BPD Zenith, EAM Swiss, InterPro Solutions, Lexco, Peacock Engineering, Projetech, Sharptree, and ZNAPZ have united under one brand: Naviam.
You’ll be redirected to the most relevant page at Naviam.io in a few seconds — or you can
go now.